PREHISTORIC FIELD NOTES

Opisthocoelicaudia

Opisthocoelicaudia is catalogued by the Paleobiology Database with Opisthocoelicaudiinae as its immediate parent group. Its place in the fossil record helps build a more detailed picture of prehistoric diversity. The name identifies a particular taxonomic record, rather than every similar-looking animal.

DINOSAURSAUROPODOMORPHCRETACEOUS
ARTISTIC RECONSTRUCTION
Categorydinosaur
Groupsauropodomorph
PeriodCretaceous
Sources reviewed11 October 2026

Is it a dinosaur?

Opisthocoelicaudia is included among dinosaurs. Dinosauria is an evolutionary group; birds are living members of it. Ancient age and a reptile-like appearance alone do not make an animal a dinosaur.

Overview

Opisthocoelicaudia is catalogued by the Paleobiology Database with Opisthocoelicaudiinae as its immediate parent group. Its place in the fossil record helps build a more detailed picture of prehistoric diversity. The name identifies a particular taxonomic record, rather than every similar-looking animal. The source overview places this animal in the Cretaceous period. Fossil catalogue records were checked for overlap with that period; their broad occurrence ranges are not treated as a precise lifespan for the genus.

Appearance & size

Sauropodomorphs include the long-necked sauropods and their earlier relatives. A small head and extended neck allowed different ways of accessing vegetation. Scientists investigate vertebral structure, weight-bearing limbs and possible air spaces in bones when reconstructing these animals. Large size does not make every long-necked dinosaur the same: limb proportions, neck anatomy and skull shapes varied across the group. Scientists distinguish directly preserved anatomy from reconstructed soft tissues. Fossil bones do not provide a complete photograph of the animal. An illustration can help you imagine the body, but details such as color, exact muscle shape and sounds need separate evidence. No body-length or body-mass figure is shown here unless independent sources support a compatible estimate. Missing measurements are left out rather than replaced with a dramatic guess.

Discovery

The naming year 1977 appears in both the source overview and the fossil catalogue. Naming is different from first discovery: material may be found years before it receives a formal scientific description. Later studies can change a genus’s membership without changing the original history of the name.

Reading the evidence

Rocks around a fossil preserve clues about the environment in which it was buried. Sediment, associated plants and other animals can help researchers reconstruct ancient landscapes. A fossil’s modern location is not the same as an ancient continent, and one locality cannot establish the entire range of a genus. Our illustrated scenery is an imaginative setting rather than a surveyed fossil site. Follow the source links to explore the underlying research. A changing reconstruction is part of scientific progress, and a missing field is a deliberate acknowledgement of uncertainty.

Questions from curious explorers

Is it a dinosaur?

Opisthocoelicaudia is included among dinosaurs.

Are the illustrations scientifically exact?

Game art and group diagrams are interpretations. Colors, sounds and many soft-tissue details are not established by the source records.

Where can I check the facts?

Follow the Wikipedia research references and Paleobiology Database records listed below. Fields without adequate corroboration are omitted.

Sources & fact-check

Genus name and available naming date cross-checked. Period labels require overlapping fossil ranges. Numerical fields without independent agreement are omitted. Reconstructions and behavior remain interpretations.

Image: Jurassic Dinos · Original SVG diagram. View image source